EXPLORING STUDENTS’ POSITION REGARDING OBJECTIVITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ACTIVISM IN SOCIAL SCIENCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29302/Pangeea24.23Keywords:
Objectivity, normativity, scientific activism, social justice activismAbstract
For driving societal change, the knowledge produced by social sciences plays an important role. But whether social sciences should contribute directly to promoting social change is up for discussion. One such contribution is towards achieving social justice, which has generated some discussions and attracted criticism. Nevertheless, some social scientists are interested in engaging in this form of activism. Others criticize it for lacking objectivity and letting political beliefs influence research. While such debates reveal where specific social scientists stand on these topics, less is known about students' perspectives and what factors play a role in shaping their views. To address this, the paper aims to explore how students in social science faculties stand when it comes to objectivity and activism, and to examine whether there is a relationship between their position and their gender and political orientation.
References
1. Banister, S., & Reinhart, R. V. (2011). TPCK for Impact: Classroom Teaching Practices That Promote Social Justice and Narrow the Digital Divide in an Urban Middle School. Computers in the Schools, 28[1], 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.551086.
2. Banister, S., & Reinhart, R. V. (2011). TPCK for Impact: Classroom Teaching Practices That Promote Social Justice and Narrow the Digital Divide in an Urban Middle School. Computers in the Schools, 28[1], 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.551086.
3. Barry, B. (2005). Why Social Justice Matters. Polity Press.
4. Buettner-Schmidt, K. & Lobo, M.,L. (2011). Social justice: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 68[4], 948–958.
5. Campbell, B. (2001). Social Justice and Sociological Theory. Society (2021) 58:355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00625-4.
6. Campbell, B., & Manning, J. (2018). The rise of victimhood culture. Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars. Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Clancy,K., & Bauer,K., (2018). Creating Student-Scholar-Activists: Discourse Instruction and Social Justice in Political Science Classrooms, New Political Science, 40:3, 542-557, DOI:10.1080/07393148.2018.1489091.
8. Fassinger, R., Morrow, L.,S., (2013). Toward Best Practices in Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Method Research:A Social Justice Perspective. Journal for Social Action in Counseling
& Psychology, 5[2], 69–83. https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.5.2.69-83.
9. Feagin, J. R. (2001). Social Justice and Sociology: Agendas for the Twenty-First Century. American Sociological Review, 66[1], 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240106600102.
10. Fisher, O. M., Brown, K. G. M., Coker, D. J., McBride, K. E., Steffens, D., Koh, C. E., & Sandroussi, C. (2020). Distributive justice during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Australia. ANZ journal of surgery, 90[6], 961–962. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16069
11. Haidt, J., & G., Lukianoff (2018). The Coddling of the American Mind. How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Press, New York.
12. Hammersley, M. (2000). Taking sides in social research. Essays on partisanship and bias. Routledge.
13. Horowitz, M., Haynor, A., Kickham, K. (2018). Sociology’s Sacred Victims and the Politics of Knowledge: Moral Foundations Theory and Disciplinary Controversies. The American Sociologist, 49(4(, 459–495. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48693427.
14. Horrowitz, I., L., (1994). Decomposition of Sociology. Oxford University Press, New York.
15. Magyari-Vincze, E. (2004). The persistence of gender inequality in Romania across political regimes. Introductory Ideas for (Re( addressing Processes of Identification.
16. Martin, C., C. (2016). How Ideology Has Hindered Sociological Insight. The American Sociologist, 47, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9263-z.
17. Miller, D. (2001). Principles of Social Justice. Harvard University Press. Cambridge
18. North, C. E. (2008). What is All this Talk about “Social Justice”? Mapping the Terrain of Education’s Latest Catchphrase. Teachers College Record, 110[6], 1182-1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811000607.
19. Oltmann, S. & Dowell, M. (2024). Social Justice and Indoctrination: Views of Faculty Accused of Bias. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61: 621-625.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1069.
20. Rawls, J., (1999). A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
21. Romero, M. (2020). Sociology Engaged in Social Justice. American Sociological Review, 85[1], 1-30. doi:10.1177/0003122419893677.
22. Sage (n.d.). Social Science for Social Justice. Sage. https://group.sagepub.com/ social-science-for-social-justice.
23. Spencer, D. (2022). The story behind the Social Science for Social Justice Series, online at https://group.sagepub.com/blog/the-story-behind-social-science-for-social-justice.
24. Wade, J., M., Bean, A., & Teixeira-Poit, S., (2019). Students, Universities and Employers: Why We All Win When We Promote Social Justice through SoTL. International Journal for the
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Vol. 13: No. 3, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130302
