THE ARCHITECTURE OF FEAR: A SOCIO-POLITICAL FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING HOW VALUES SHAPE THE FEAR OF TECHNOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29302/Pangeea25.42Keywords:
Technology, fear, social construction of risk perception, value systemsAbstract
This article presents a theoretical framework to explain why rapid technological changes often generate deep and polarizing social fear. The author argues that public reactions to innovations such as artificial intelligence, 5G, mRNA vaccines, or biotechnologies are not manifestations of ignorance or irrationality, but rather the predictable result of a conflict between new technologies and deeply entrenched fundamental value systems. The paper postulates that key ideologies—particularly conservatism, which values stability, tradition, and hierarchy, and progressivism, which favors reform, innovation, and equality—act as perceptual and moral filters. These filters determine which aspects of a technology individuals focus on (e.g., the risk of social disruption versus the opportunity to solve problems) and imbue them with emotional and moral significance. Through specific case studies, the article demonstrates how individual anxieties are socially amplified and transformed into a culture of fear, shifting the debate from the technical characteristics of the innovation to a broader conflict over competing visions of society. Ultimately, the paper builds a holistic model that challenges the deficit model, offering a socio-political perspective in which the fear of technology is understood as a logical, albeit emotionally charged, reaction to perceived threats to identity, security, and moral values.
References
1. Bain, R. (1937). Technology and State Government. American Sociological Review, 2(6), 860–874.
2. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage Publications.
3. Chelcea, S (2009). Piramida fricilor sociale. Fricile sociale în România - o schiţă psihosociologicã, Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
4. Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2005). Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press.
6. Fletcher, J. G. (2019). Deepfakes, Artificial Intelligence, and Some Kind of Dystopia: The New Faces of Online Post-Fact Performance. Theatre Journal, 70(4), 455-471.
7. Furedi, F. (1997). The culture of fear: Risk-taking and the morality of low expectation. Continuum International Publishing Group.
8. Giddens, A. (1998). Making Sense of Modernity: Conversations with Anthony Giddens. Polity Press.
9. Glassner, B. (2010). The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things. Basic Books.
10. Hechter, M. (1993). Values research in the social and behavioral science. In M. H. Hechter, L. Nadel, & R. Michod (Eds.). The origin of values, Aldine de Gruyter, 1–10.
11. Heywood, A. (2012). Political ideologies: An introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Huesemann, M. H., & Huesemann, J. A. (2011). Technofix: Why Technology Won’t Save Us or the Environment. New Society Publishers.
13. Jones, S. E. (2006). Against technology: From the Luddites to neo-Luddism. CRC Press.
14. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375.
15. Linton, D. (1992). The Luddites: How Did They Get That Bad Reputation?. Labor History, 33(4), 529-537.
16. MacKenzie, D. A., & Wajcman, J. (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press.
17. McClintock, Charles G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement and development. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 12, 121-137.
18. Meese, J. (2020). COVID-19, 5G conspiracies and infrastructural futures. Media International Australia, 177, 30–46.
19. Muller, J. Z. (1997). Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton University Press.
20. Nugent, W. (2010). Progressivism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
21. Öhman, A. (2008). Fear and Anxiety: Overlaps and Dissociations. In Handbook of Emotions. The Guilford Press.
22. Renn, O. (1992). Social theories of risk. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk. Praeger, Praeger, 53-79.
23. Schatzberg, E. (2006). Technik comes to America: Changing meanings of technology before 1930. Technology and Culture, 47(3), 486–512.
24. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427-459.
25. Spencer-Oatey, Helen & Peter Franklin, What is culture? A compilation of quotations for the intercultural field. GlobalPeople Core Concepts, 1, 2012.
26. Stoica, V. (2024). Valori împărtăşite şi riscuri percepute: Schimbările tehnologice ca factori declanşatori ai fricii. Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi.
27. Szollosy, M. F. (2017). Frankenstein and our fear of robots: Projection in our cultural perception of technology. AI & Society, 32(3), 433–439.
28. Taleb, N. N. (2007/2018). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House.
29. Thielens, A., Bell, D., Mortimore, D. B., et al. (2018). Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz. Scientific Reports, 8, 3924.
30. Watkins, F. (1970). Democracy. In Encyclopædia Britannica, 7, 215–223.
31. Westerlund, M. (2019). The emergence of deepfake technology: A review. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11), 39–52.
