SOCIAL MEDIA, GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES AND DIGITAL WELL-BEING: NEW SOCIAL CHALLENGES IN THE 21ST CENTURY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29302/Pangeea25.35Keywords:
social media, digital well-being, generational differences, digital communicationAbstract
The paper examines the psychosocial effects of social media use among young people, emphasizing intergenerational differences in communication, emotional expression, and digital well-being. The research is based on an online survey conducted within the Erasmus+ Blended Intensive Programme “The impact of social media addiction on young people” in May 2025, involving students from five European countries. The results show that participants from Generation Z spend an average of one to five hours per day on social media (mainly TikTok and Instagram), primarily for entertainment and social interaction. Respondents report common experiences of anxiety, comparison, and difficulties in expressing emotions online, while also demonstrating awareness of the need for digital balance. The findings highlight the necessity of interdisciplinary approaches to address the social and emotional challenges of the digital age.
References
1. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York, ISBN 0-688-11912-3.
2. Lembke, A. (2021). Dopamine nation: Finding balance in the age of indulgence. New York: Dutton.
3. Mucea, B. N. (2022). A generation in pandemic – The first longitudinal study on the career and the emergence in the labor market of graduates of a dual vocational school. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov. Series VII: Social Sciences • Law, 15(64)(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2022.15.64.2.5 Webbut+1
4. Mucea, B. N. (2023). „Chiulul” adolescenţilor în timpul orelor online din perioada pandemiei de COVID 19. Buletinul Ştiin ific al Universităţii de Stat „B. P. Hasdeu” din Cahul: Ştiinţe Sociale, XVII(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10438918
5. Mucea, B. N., & Pătru a, A. (2024). Workplace reporting: A descriptive analysis of students' opinions employed in a multinational company. Research and Science Today, 1(27)/2024, 71–80
6. Newport, C. (2019). Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. New York: Portfolio.
7. Prensky, M. (2001) "Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1", On the Horizon, Vol. 9 Issue: 5,pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816
8. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
9. Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Hoboken.
11. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois Press, 1-117.
12. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
13. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003
14. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 009365096023001001
15. Zuboff, S. (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power: New York: Public Affairs, 704 pp. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-01100-0
