TESTING ELECTORAL EFFECTIVENESS OF ‘PROGRAMMATIC GREENING’ AS A POST-INDUSTRIAL PARTY-LED ADAPTATION STRATEGY FOR WESTERN LEFT-WING POLITICAL PARTY FAMILIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29302/Pangeea25.31Keywords:
political parties, environmentalist signals, environmental mentions, left-wingAbstract
The purpose of this research is to analyze the electoral effectiveness of the left-wing political parties’ programmatic greening strategy to combat their shrinking electoral bases in the post-industrial era. More frankly, it explores the link between the frequency of left-wing political parties’ environmentalist programmatic signals and their vote shares. The supply-side or top-down approach established that individual voting preferences are being shaped by choice sets provided by political parties. Accordingly, it is suggested that as the ideology-burdened post-war political environment ended, the relevance of ideologies and class positions for voting preference weakened and the left-wing electoral bases shrank. In return, left-wing political parties adopted catchall strategies to increase their grip on the median voter. One of the alternative adaptation strategies in this regard was increasing environmentalist signals in their manifesto documents. To test whether this strategy was an electorally effective one, this study raises the following question: Did more frequent green programmatic signals help left-wing political parties achieve higher vote shares? Using quantitative methods of inquiry, this research analyzes Manifesto Project’s data for 1,939 manifesto documents, which were released between the years 1920 and 2018 in 56 democratic countries. Findings showed that those parties with more frequent environmental mentions in their manifesto documents were not, in general, voted at statistically significantly higher levels than those with less frequent environmental mentions. The result is valid not only for left-wing political parties but for all party families. Thus, this research concludes that increasing the tone of green programmatic signals is not an effective post-industrial adaptation strategy to follow in order to combat declining vote shares. Findings have important implications for current accounts of spatial theories of party competition, party conflict, electoral adaptation and realignment strategies of political parties, as well as issue salience, green politics, and the recently changing nature of the electoral effectiveness of party policy shifts.
References
1. Abrams, M., Rose, R., & Hinden, R. (1960). Must Labour Lose?
2. Abou-Chadi, T., & Wagner, M. (2019). The electoral appeal of party strategies in postindustrial societies: when can the mainstream left succeed?. The Journal of Politics, 81(4), 1405-1419.
3. Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., & Glasgow, G. (2006). Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties' policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 513-529.
4. Alford, R. R. (1963). Party and society: the Anglo-American democracies.
5. Andersen, J. G. (1990). ‘Environmentalism’,‘New Politics’ and Industrialism: Some Theoretical Perspectives. Scandinavian Political Studies, 13(2), 101-118.
6. Andersen, R., & Heath, A. (2002). Class matters: the persisting effects of contextual social class on individual voting in Britain, 1964–97. European sociological review, 18(2), 125-138.
7. Ares, M. (2022). Issue politicization and social class: How the electoral supply activates class divides in political preferences. European Journal of Political Research, 61(2), 503-523.
8. Arndt, C. (2013). The electoral consequences of third way welfare state reforms: Social democracy’s transformation and its political costs (p. 280). Amsterdam University Press.
9. Arter, D. (2000). The Finnish election of 21 March 1999: Towards a distinctive model of government?.
10. Arzheimer, K. (2013). Working Class Partis 2.0. Competition Between Centre-Left and Extreme Right Parties In: Rydgren, J.(eds): Class Politics and'the Radical Right. Oxon: Routledge.
11. Backes, U., & Moreau, P. (Eds.). (2008). Communist and post-communist parties in Europe. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Testing Electoral Effectiveness of ‘Programmatic Greening’ as a Post-Industrial Party-Led Adaptation Strategy 181
12. Barry, J. (2014). Green political theory. In Political ideologies (pp. 153-178). Routledge.
13. Best, R. E. (2011). The declining electoral relevance of traditional cleavage groups. European Political Science Review, 3(2), 279-300.
14. Bornschier, S., & Kriesi, H. (2012). The populist right, the working class, and the changing face of class politics. In Class politics and the radical right (pp. 10-30). Routledge.
15. Broockman, D. E., & Butler, D. M. (2017). The causal effects of elite position taking on voter attitudes: Field experiments with elite communication. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 208-221.
16. Brooks, C., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Manza, J. (2006). Cleavage-based voting behavior in cross-national perspective: Evidence from six postwar democracies. Social Science Research, 35(1), 88-128.
17. Budge, I. (2001). Mapping policy preferences: estimates for parties, electors, and governments, 1945-1998 (Vol. 1). OUP Oxford.
18. Bürklin, W. P. (1985). The German Greens: The post-industrial non-established and the party system. International Political Science Review, 6(4), 463-481.
19. Bürklin, W. P. (1987). Governing left parties frustrating the radical non-established left: the rise and inevitable decline of the Greens. European Sociological Review, 3(2), 109-126.
20. Carter, N. (2013). Greening the mainstream: party politics and the environment. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 73-94.
21. Charalambous, G., & Lamprianou, I. (2017). The (non) particularities of West European radical left party supporters: comparing left party families. European Political Science Review, 9(3), 375-400.
22. Clark, T. N., & Lipset, S. M. (1991). Are social classes dying?. International sociology, 6(4), 397-410.
23. Dalton, R. J., & Wattenberg, M. P. (1993). The not so simple act of voting. Political science: The state of the discipline II, 2, 193-218.
24. De Graaf, N. D., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Heath, A. (1995). Class mobility and political preferences: individual and contextual effects. American journal of sociology, 100(4), 997-1027.
25. Dickson, B. J. (2004). Dilemmas of Party Adaptation: The CCP's Strategies for Survival 1. In State and society in 21st Century China (pp. 141-158). Routledge.
26. Elff, M. (2007). Social structure and electoral behavior in comparative perspective: The decline of social cleavages in Western Europe revisited. Perspectives on politics, 5(2), 277-294.
27. Elff, M. (2009). Social divisions, party positions, and electoral behaviour. Electoral Studies, 28(2), 297-308.
28. Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe. J.H. (1992) The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29. Evans, G. (2000). The continued significance of class voting. Annual review of political science, 3(1), 401-417.
30. Evans, G. (2006). The social bases of political divisions in post-communist Eastern Europe. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 32(1), 245-270.
31. Evans, G., & De Graaf, N. D. (Eds.). (2013). Political choice matters: Explaining the strength of class and religious cleavages in cross-national perspective. OUP Oxford.
32. Evans, G., Heath, A., & Payne, C. (1991). Modelling trends in the class/party relationship 1964–87. Electoral Studies, 10(2), 99-117.
33. Evans, G., Heath, A., & Payne, C. (1999). Class: Labour as a Catch-Ail Party?. In Critical elections: British parties and voters in long-term perspective (pp. 88-101). SAGE Publications Ltd.
34. Evans, G., & Tilley, J. (2012a). How parties shape class politics: Explaining the decline of the class basis of party support. British journal of political science, 42(1), 137-161.
35. Evans, G., & Tilley, J. (2012b). The depoliticization of inequality and redistribution: Explaining the decline of class voting. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 963-976.
36. Evans, G., & Tilley, J. (2017). The new politics of class: The political exclusion of the British working class. Oxford University Press.
37. Flanagan, S. C., & Lee, A. R. (2003). The new politics, culture wars, and the authoritarian-libertarian value change in advanced industrial democracies. Comparative political studies, 36(3), 235-270.
38. Franklin, M. N. (1985). The decline of class voting in Britain: Changes in the basis of electoral choice, 1964-1983.
39. Franklin, M. N. (1992). The decline of cleavage politics. Electoral change: Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in Western countries, 383-405.
40. Gourley, P., & Khamis, M. (2023). It is not easy being a Green party: Green politics as a normal good. European Journal of Political Economy, 76, 102266.
41. Green, J. (2007). When voters and parties agree: Valence issues and party competition. Political Studies, 55(3), 629-655.
42. Green Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2010). Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda setting. European Journal of Political Research, 49(2), 257-281.
43. Heath, A., Evans, G., & Payne, C. (1995). Modelling the class party relationship in Britain, 1964–92. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 158(3), 563-574.
44. Heath, A., & Jowell, R. John Curtice, 1985: How Britain Votes.
45. Heath, A. F., Jowell, R. M., & Curtice, J. K. (2001). The rise of New Labour: Party policies and voter choices. OUP Oxford.
46. Hobolt, S. B., & De Vries, C. E. (2015). Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 1159-1185.
47. Hunold, C., & Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Green political theory and the state: Context is everything. Global Environmental Politics, 2(3), 17-39.
48. Hutton, D., & Connors, L. (2004). The left dilemma for the Greens. Social Alternatives, 23(1), 34-37.
49. Inglehart, R. (1977). Values, objective needs, and subjective satisfaction among western publics. Comparative Political Studies, 9(4), 429-458.
50. Inglehart, R., & Rabier, J. R. (1986). Political realignment in advanced industrial society: from class based politics to quality of life politics. Government and Opposition, 21(4), 456-479
51. Jacobs, M., & Hindmoor, A. (2024). Labour, left and right: On party positioning and policy reasoning. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 26(1), 3-21.
52. Jansen, G., Evans, G., & De Graaf, N. D. (2013). Class voting and Left–Right party positions: A comparative study of 15 Western democracies, 1960–2005. Social science research, 42(2), 376-400.
53. Kammerlander, A., & Schulze, G. G. (2020). Are democracies cleaner?. European Journal of Political Economy, 64, 101920.
54. Karreth, J., Polk, J. T., & Allen, C. S. (2013). Catchall or catch and release? The electoral consequences of social democratic parties’ march to the middle in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 791-822.
55. Kelley, J., McAllister, I., & Mughan, A. (1985). The decline of class revisited: Class and party in England, 1964–1979. American Political Science Review, 79(3), 719-737.
56. Kirchheimer, O. (1966). Private man and society. Political Science Quarterly, 81(1), 1-24.
57. Kitschelt, H. (1989). The internal politics of parties: the law of curvilinear disparity revisited. Political studies, 37(3), 400-421.
58. Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy. cambridge university press.
59. Kriesi, H. (1998). The transformation of cleavage politics The 1997 Stein Rokkan lecture. European journal of political research, 33(2), 165-185.
60. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European journal of political research, 45(6), 921-956.
61. Krouwel, A. (2012). Party transformations in European democracies. State University of New York Press. Testing Electoral Effectiveness of ‘Programmatic Greening’ as a Post-Industrial Party-Led Adaptation Strategy 183
62. Lane, J. E., & Ersson, S. (1997). Parties and voters: What creates the ties?. Scandinavian Political Studies, 20(2), 179-196.
63. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1968). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.
64. Lehrer, R. (2012). Intra-party democracy and party responsiveness. West European Politics, 35(6), 1295-1319.
65. Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction (Vol. 2). New York: Free Press.
66. Manza et al. (1995). Class voting in capitalist democracies since World War II: Dealignment, Realignment, or Trendless Fluctuation. Annu. Rev. Sociol, 21, 13742.
67. Manwaring, R., & Kennedy, P. (Eds.). (2017). Why the left loses: The decline of the centre-left in comparative perspective. Policy Press.
68. McAllister, I., & Mughan, A. (1985). Attitudes, Issues, and Labour Party Decline in England, 1974-1979. Comparative Political Studies, 18(1), 37-57.
69. Nieuwbeerta, P. (1995). The democratic class struggle in twenty countries 1945-1990. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
70. Nieuwbeerta, P. (1996). The democratic class struggle in postwar societies: Class voting in twenty countries, 1945-1990. Acta Sociologica, 39(4), 345-383.
71. Nieuwbeerta, P., & De Graaf, N. D. (1999). Traditional class voting in twenty postwar societies (pp. 23-56). New York: Oxford University Press.
72. Norris, P. (2019). Varieties of populist parties. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45(9-10), 981-1012.
73. Oskarson, M., & Demker, M. (2015). Room for realignment: The working-class sympathy for Sweden Democrats. Government and Opposition, 50(4), 629-651.
74. Prysby, C. L. (1977). Psychological sources of working-class support for leftist political parties. The Journal of Politics, 39(4), 1073-1081.
75. Przeworski, A. (1985). Capitalism and social democracy. Cambridge University Press.
76. Przeworski, A. & Sprague. John (1986): Paper stones. A History of electoral socialism.
77. Rennwald, L., & Evans, G. (2014). When supply creates demand: Social democratic party strategies and the evolution of class voting. West European Politics, 37(5), 1108-1135.
78. Richardson, J. (1995). The market for political activism: interest groups as a challenge to political parties. West European Politics, 18(1), 116-139.
79. Rose, R., & McAllister, I. (1986). Voters begin to choose: From closed-class to open elections in Britain.
80. Sartori, G. (1969). Politics, ideology, and belief systems. American political science review, 63(2), 398-411.
81. Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Timely decisions: The effects of past national elections on party policy change. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 238-248.
82. Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S., & Weßels, B. (2017). The Manifesto Data Collection, Version 2017a. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
83. Wagner, M., Abou-Chadi, T., & Bischof, D. (2018). When Do Parties Politicize New Issues?. In Between Issue Evolution and Populism: Causes and Consequences of Challenger Party Success in European Democracies.
84. Wang, C., & Keith, D. (2020). The greening of European radical left parties: red and green politics. Journal of contemporary European studies, 28(4), 494-513.
85. Webb, P. (2004). Party responses to the changing electoral market in Britain. In Political Parties and Electoral Change: Party Responses to Electoral Markets (pp. 20-48). SAGE Publications Ltd.
86. Zilliacus, K. O. (2001). ‘New politics’ in Finland: The Greens and the Left Wing in the 1990s. West European Politics, 24(1), 27-54.
