INTERGENERATIONAL SOLIDARITY, BETWEEN OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITS FOR SOCIAL POLICIES

Authors

  • Marie Leonte “Ştefan cel Mare” University, Suceava, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29302/Pangeea25.25

Keywords:

Intergenerational solidarity, social cohesion, active ageing, intergenerational justice, intergenerational fairness.

Abstract

In the context of the demographic, social and economic evolution in europe in general and in romania in particular, a new guiding principle in the development of social policies is gradually emerging: intergenerational solidarity. Rather, it is a principle of social law in the making, which acquires its own content and a special place in the architecture of the construction of a sustainable social system. The declared aim is to make intergenerational solidarity a remedy that manages, in the most satisfactory way, a whole range of challenges pertaining to a wide range of fields, from economics to climate change, from social work to cultural interconnectivity. The sedes materiae for intergenerational solidarity is represented by art. 3 par. (3) § 2 of the treaty on european union, according to which, "the union shall combat social exclusion and discrimination and promote social justice and protection, equality between women and men, solidarity between generations and the protection of the child's rights", the principle appearing alongside the principle of social cohesion, provided for in the same paragraph. As stated in the european parliament resolution of 9 september 2015 on the report on the implementation, results and overall assessment of the european year for active ageing and solidarity between generations (2017/c 316/15), solidarity between generations is one of the basic principles of a human society but also a key element, a tool, together with active ageing, for achieving the objectives and targets of the europe 2020 strategy with a view to achieving a competitive, prosperous and inclusive europe. At the same time, together with equity between young and older people, intergenerational solidarity represents, in the sense given to it by the green paper on ageing entitled fostering solidarity and responsibility between generations, the completion of sustainable solutions for our social protection system. In social policies, the difficulty is twofold, as it is necessary to design policies, programs and measures that go beyond the limited term of a government mandate, but also to adapt them to the legal concept, that tends to include a new variable: generations that currently do not exist in the paradigm of social policies. However, although the principle of intergenerational solidarity has the advantage of responding to contemporary socio-economic realities, in reason of its being claimed by multiple fields, and thus undergoing continuous mutations, it carries within it, the risk of ineffectiveness. That is the very reason why the european commission is currently carrying out a large consultation to consolidate another - similar - principle, the intergenerational fairness.

References

1. Anders, I. T. (2024). Connect5: Intergenerational Communication in the Workplace.

2. Artus, P. (2010). La solidarité intergénérationnelle peut-elle survivre à la crise ? Regards Croisés Sur l’économie, 2010/1 n° 7, 56-65. https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.007.0056

3. Attias-Donfut, C., & Loriaux, M. (2013). La cohésion sociale: Au fil des générations... Retraite et Société, 2013/1(n° 64), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.3917/rs.064.0135

4. Bauer, A. (2025). Les boomeurs ne devraient pasprendre la responsabilité de léguer une planète épuisée. Le Figaro, 27.10.

5. Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, R. E. L. (1991). Intergenerational Solidarity in Aging Families: An Example of Formal Theory Construction. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 53(4), 856-870. Marie Leonte114

6. Blanchet, D. (2010). Le débat sur la retraite en France: Le critère intergénérationnel aide-t-il à tr ancher ? Regards Croisés Sur l’économie, 2010 /1( n° 7), 12 5-13 5. https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.007.0125

7. Blanchet, D. (2021). Évaluer l’équité et la solidarité inter et intragénérationnelles: Quel apport des indicateurs monétaires ? Regards. Ed. EN3S-École Nationale Supérieure de Sécurité Sociale, 2021/1(N° 59), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.3917/regar.059.0041

8. Call for evidence for an Initiative: Strategy on Intergenerational Fairness: Hearing before the DG EAC (2025).

9. CESE, 2005/C157/28, CESE, Avis du Comité économique et social européen sur les „relations entre générations” (2005).

10. Chauvel, L. (2010). Comment définir les victimes du changement social cohortal ? Regards Croisés Sur l’économie, 2010/1(n° 7), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.007.0028

11. COM (2021) 50 Final, No. COM (2021) 50 final, Cartea verde privind îmbătrânirea populaţiei intitulată Promovarea solidarităţii şi a responsabilităţii între generaţii (2021).

12. COM(2007) 359 Final, COM(2007) 359 final, Comunicarea Comisiei către Consiliu, Parlamentul European, Comitetul Economic şi Social şi Comitetul Regiunilor. Către principii comune ale flexisecurităţii: Locuri de muncă mai multe şi mai bune prin flexibilitate şi securitate (2007).

13. Consiliul UE, 2022/C 495/03, Concluziile Consiliului şi ale reprezentanților guvernelor statelor membre reuniţi în cadrul Consiliului privind promovarea dimensiunii intergeneraţionale în domeniul tineretului pentru a facilita dialogul şi coeziunea socială (2022).

14. Dufeu, A. (2021). Comment combattre l’âgisme ? Regards, 2021/1(N° 59), 91-101.

15. EESC, 2014/C 311/01, Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on intergenerational and intercultural measures to foster social integration of young EU citizens taking up employment in another Member State (2014).

16. EESC, C/2024/6869, Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee - Promoting European intergenerational solidarity - towards an EU horizontal approach (2024).

17. European Parliament. (2017). 2017/C 316/15 (No. 2017/C 316/15; European Parliament Resolution of 9 September 2015 on the Report on the Implementation, Results and Overall Assessment of the 2012 European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations (2014/2255(INI))).

18. Ferrari, S., & Mery, J. (2008). Equité intergénérationnelle et préoccupations environnementales. Réflexions autour de l’actualisation. Management & Avenir, 2008/6(n° 20,), 240-257. https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.020.0240

19. Galland, O. (2021). Fossé ou conflit entre générations. Mythes et réalités. Regards. Éditions EN3S-École Nationale Supérieure de Sécurité Sociale, 2021/1(N° 59), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.3917/regar.059.0067

20. Garlaud, F. (2021). Le soutien de la Cnav aux initiatives intergénérationnelles. Regards. Éditions EN3S-École Nationale Supérieure de Sécurité Sociale, 2021/1(N° 59), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.3917/regar.059.0077

21. Gerhardt, M., Nachemson-Ekwall, J., & Fogel, B. (2021). Gentelligence: The Revolutionary Approach to Leading an Intergenerational Workforce. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

22. Gosseries, A. (2010). Une métaphore de la justice intergénérationnelle. Regards Croisés Sur l’économie. Éditions La Découverte, 2010/1(n° 7), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.007.0193

23. Guégano, Y. (2021). L’équité intergénérationnelle appréciée à partir des travaux du Conseil d’orientation des retraites. Regards. Éditions EN3S-École Nationale Supérieure de Sécurité Sociale, 2021/1(N° 59), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.3917/regar.059.0053

24. Huyez-Levrat, G. (2013). La transmission des savoirs entre générations dans l’entreprise: Trois questions préliminaires. Retraite et Société. Éditions La Documentation Française, 2013/1(n° 64), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.3917/rs.064.0170

25. Lahire, B. (2010). La transmission familiale de l’ordre inégal des choses. Regards Croisés Sur l’économie, 2010/1(n° 7), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.007.0203

26. Le Nouveau Petit Robert. (2000). In Le Nouveau Petit Robert. Dictionnaire alphabétique et analogique de la langue française (p. 1130).

27. Lima, L. (2010). Les différences de situations entre générations dans le débat public. Regards Croisés Sur l’économie. Éditions La Découverte, 2010/1(n° 7), 71-79.

https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.007.0071

28. Militaru, I. N. (2017). Dreptul Uniunii Europene. Cronologie. Izvoare. Principii. Instituţii. Piaţa internă a Uniunii Europene. Libertăţile fundamentale (ed. a 3a). Universul Juridic.

29. Moulaert, T. (2013). L’outplacement des 45 ans et plus en Belgique Une tentative avortée de gouvernement à distance des fins de carrière ? Retraite et Société. Éditions La Documentation Française, 2013/1(n° 64), 107-131. https://doi.org/10.3917/rs.064.0107

30. Navarro, M. (2010). Les comportements politiques: Continuité ou opposition entre les générations? Regards Croisés Sur l’économie. Éditions La Découverte, 2010/1(n° 7), 211-215. https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.007.0211

31. Plesa, S. (2012). Solidaritatea între generaţii este posibilă. Revista Cariere.

32. Sackmann, R. (2007). Social Protection: Is there a Growing Intergenerational Inequity ? Horizons Stratégiques. Éditions La Documentation Française, 2007/3(n° 5), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.3917/hori.005.0120

33. Solignac, M. (2010). L’économie politique du vieillissement. Regards Croisés Sur l’économie. Éditions La Découverte, 2010/1(n° 7), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.007.0066

34. Voicu, M. (2024). Scurte reflecţii despre viaţa fără speranţă a bătrânilor (”seniorilor”) în epoca Inteligenţei Artificiale. Juridice.

35. Von der Leyen, U. (2024). Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission 2024 2029.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-08

Issue

Section

Articole

Categories

How to Cite

INTERGENERATIONAL SOLIDARITY, BETWEEN OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITS FOR SOCIAL POLICIES. (2026). PANGEEA, 25(2), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.29302/Pangeea25.25