TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS DURING TIMES OF CRISIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29302/Pangeea25.51Keywords:
institutional trust, crisis, income, place of residence, national institutions, european institutionsAbstract
This paper started from Mattei Doggan’s research, which emphasized that trust in institutions is plummeting, generating a political crisis. In recent years, armed conflicts and financial, health, and refugee crises faced by EU nation states have produced not only socioeconomic tensions, but have also shaken the citizens’ trust in both national and supranational institutions. Institutional trust is important due to the fact that it directly illustrates people's support towards national and supranational organizations. Political scientists, such as David Easton and Pippa Norris, have argued that trust in institutions is an indicator of organizational efficiency. Institutional trust has been extensively researched, from a numerical perspective, illustrating how it has evolved over time. However, the way in which peoples’ levels of trust changed during and after a period of crisis and what are the factors which influenced these attitude shifts are fairly undocumented. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic occurred recently, there is a lack of literature regarding the way in which citizens’ trust in national and supranational organizations has evolved before, during and after the period of the Coronavirus. This research, which analysis the influence of the health crisis on institutional trust, provides valuable insights, by illustrating the factors which contributed to the deepening of the crisis generated by the lack of trust. This paper provides an in-depth analysis that identifies what factors influence the attitudes of Romanians, Bulgarians, Poles and Hungarians towards national and international institutions. The research method is secondary data analysis of the Eurobarometer. In this paper, I included data collected from the Spring Standard Eurobarometer between 2018 and 2023, which mostly evaluated trust in national and supranational organizations. I began with frequencies and cross-tabs to present the general trust towards institutions. Afterwards, I used Pearson Correlation, regression and factorial analyses in order to identify the attitude predictors towards trust in national and European institutions. The results were mixed. While Poles and Hungarians had more trust in national institutions than Romanians and Bulgarians before Covid, during the pandemic these differences decreased. However, Romanians and Bulgarians perceived European Institutions more positively during the pandemic. Younger and more educated people tended to have more trust in supranational institutions, regardless of nationality. Moreover, Polish people tended to regain trust in national institutions after Covid faster than others.
References
1. Bailey, P. E., & Leon, T. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of age-related differences in trust. Innovation in Aging, 3(Supplement_1), S477–S477. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz038.1775
2. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.
3. Bauman, Z., & Haugaard, M. (2008). Liquid modernity and power: A dialogue with Zygmunt Bauman1. Journal of Power, 1(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290802227536
4. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications.
5. Biancolella, M., Colona, V. L., Mehrian-Shai, R., Watt, J. L., Luzzatto, L., Novelli, G., &Reichardt, J. K. V. (2022). COVID-19 2022 update: transition of the pandemic to the endemic phase. Human Genomics, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-022-00392-1
6. Bobzien, L. (2023). Income Inequality and Political Trust: Do Fairness Perceptions Matter? Social Indicators Research, 169(1-2), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03168-9
7. Boslaugh, S. (2007). Secondary data sources for public health : a practical guide. Cambridge University Press.
8. Cheah, P. (2006). Cosmopolitanism. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300290
9. Cristea, D., Ilie, D.-G., Constantinescu, C., & Fîrțală, V. (2022). Acceptance, Hesitancy, and Refusal in Anti-COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cluster Analysis Aiming at the Typology behind These Three Concepts. Vaccines, 10(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091496
10. Delanty, G., & Rumford, C. (2005). Rethinking Europe. Routledge.
11. Devine, D., Gaskell, J., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2020). Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature. Political Studies Review, 19(2), 147892992094868. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920948684
12. Dogan, M. (1997). Erosion of confidence in advanced democracies. Studies in Comparative International Development, 32(3), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02687328
13. Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C. R., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., Spiegelhalter, D., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world.Journal of Risk Research, 23(7-8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193
14. EUR-Lex. (2024). EUR-Lex - Access to European Union law, democratic_deficit - EN - EUR-Lex. Eur-Lex.europa.eu. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/democratic-deficit.html
15. European Comission. (2019). Growing together: EU support to Hungary that joined in 2004 (pp. 1–3). European Comission. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/factsheets/2019/growing-together-eu-support-to-hungary-that-joined in-2004#:~:text=Hungary%20was%20among%20the%2010%20countries%20to,and%20for%20businesses%20to%20settle%20and%20thrive.
16. European Comission. (2021). Special Eurobarometer 508 “Values and Identities of EU citizens” (pp. 1–191). European Comission.
17. European Commission. (2025). Eurobarometer. Europa.eu. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3383
18. European Union. (2025). Achievements and Benefits | European Union. European Union. https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/achievements_en
19. Falcone, R., Colì, E., Felletti, S., Sapienza, A., Castelfranchi, C., & Paglieri, F. (2020). All We Need Is Trust: How the COVID-19 Outbreak Reconfigured Trust in Italian Public Institutions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561747
20. Federazione Italiana Diritti Umani. (2021). How much do we know about the EU? A survey about communication and disinformation. In FIDU.it (pp. 1–15). https://fidu.it/wp-content/uploads/General-Report-draft.FINAL_.pdf
21. Goldstein, D. A. N., & Wiedemann, J. (2021). Who Do You Trust? The Consequences of Partisanship and Trust for Public Responsiveness to COVID-19 Orders. Perspectives on Politics, 20(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592721000049
22. González-Melado, F. J., & Di Pietro, M. L. (2021). The vaccine against COVID-19 and institutional trust. Enfermedades Infecciosas Y Microbiologia Clinica (English Ed.), 39(10).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2021.09.001
23. Hakhverdian, A., & Mayne, Q. (2012). Institutional Trust, Education, and Corruption: A Micro-Macro Interactive Approach. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381612000412
24. Han, Q., Zheng, B., Cristea, M., Agostini, M., Belanger, J. J., Gutzkow, B., Kreienkamp, J., & Leander, N. P. (2021). Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Psychological Medicine, 53(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291721001306
25. Hannerz, U. (2007). Cosmopolitanism. In A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Blackwell Publishing.
26. Hensel, H. M. (2023). Soviets Take Control of Eastern Europe | Research Starters | EBSCO R e s e a r c h . E B S C O . h t t p s : / / w w w . e b s c o . c o m / r e s e a r c h - s t a r t e r s / h i s t o r y/soviets-take-control-eastern-europe#research-starter-title
27. Hill, P. L., Allemand, M., & Burrow, A. L. (2023). Trust in purpose, or trust and purpose?: Institutional trust influences the association between sense of purpose and COVID-19 vaccination. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 165, 111119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111119
28. Kolodziejczyk, K. (2016). Poland in the European Union. Ten Years of Membership. Revista UNISCI, 0(40). https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_runi.2016.n40.51803
29. Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Ethnic and Civic Conceptions of Nationhood and the Differential Success of the Extreme Right in Germany and Italy. In How Social Movements Matter (pp. 1–359). University of Minnesota Press.
30. Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a Measure of Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647
31. Leong, D. P., Eikelboom, J. W., & Yusuf, S. (2021). The Indirect Consequences of the Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 77(2), 186–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.028
32. Li, T., & Fung, H. H. (2013). Age differences in trust: an investigation across 38 countries. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(3), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs072
33. Lipps, J., & Schraff, D. (2020). Regional inequality and institutional trust in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12430
34. Mukherjee, S. (2020). What Drives Gender Differences in Trust and Trustworthiness? Public Finance Review, 48(6), 109114212096080. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142120960801
35. Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
36. Oksanen, A., Kaakinen, M., Latikka, R., Savolainen, I., Savela, N., & Koivula, A. (2020). Regulation and Trust: 3-Month Follow-up Study on COVID-19 Mortality in 25 European Countries. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e19218. https://doi.org/10.2196/19218 37. Olsen, A. L. O., & Hjorth, F. (2020). Willingness to Distance in the COVID-19 Pandemic. OSF, 1–17. file:///C:/Users/Lenovo/Downloads/Willingness%20to%20Distance%20in%20the %20COVID-19%20Pandemic.pdf
38. Pattyn, V., Matthys, J., & Hecke, S. V. (2020). High-stakes crisis management in the Low Countries: Comparing government responses to COVID-19. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(3), 002085232097247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320972472
39. Pripp, V. (2024). Perception Towards Immigration in Romania and Bulgaria. Perspective Politice, 17(1-2). https://doi.org/10.25019/perspol/24.17.13
40. Rzymski, P., Pokorska-Spiewak, M., Jackowska, T., Kuchar, E., Nitsch-Osuch, A., Pawlowska, M., Babicki, M., Jaroszewicz, J., Szenborn, L., Wysocki, J., & Flisiak, R. (2023). Key Considerations during the Transition from the Acute Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review. Vaccines, 11(9), 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11091502
41. Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The Interface Between Ethnic and National Attachment: Ethnic Pluralism or Ethnic Dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1,Special Issue on Race), 102. https://doi.org/10.1086/297789
42. Sztompka, P. (2006). New Perspectives on Trust. Political Mistrust and the Discrediting of Politicians. American Journal of Sociology, 112(3), 905–919. https://doi.org/10.1086/510993
43. Toshkov , D., Carroll , B., & Yesilkagit , K. (2022). Government capacity, societal trust or partypreferences: what accounts for the variety of nationalpolicy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe? JOURNAL of EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 29(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1928270
44. Ugur-Cinar, M., Cinar, K., & Kose, T. (2020). How Does Education Affect Political Trust?: An Analysis of Moderating Factors. Social Indicators Research, 152(2), 779–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02463-z
45. Urbinati, N. (2010). Representative democracy: principles and genealogy. Chicago, Ill. University Of Chicago Press.
46. Warf, B. (2020). Cosmopolitanism. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp.1–275). Elsevier.
47. World Health Organisation. (2025). Health topics/Pandemics. Who.int. https://www.who.int/health-topics/pandemics
48. Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2013). Gender Differences in Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior, 47(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513491571
