SOCIAL INTEGRATION AND DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION:CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES AND PATHWAYS FOR THEINCLUSION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29302/Pangeea25.52Keywords:
social integration, deinstitutionalization, disability, inclusion, social policyAbstract
The paper examines the relationship between social integration, deinstitutionalization, and the inclusion of persons with disabilities in contemporary society. It aims to provide a theoretical and policy-oriented perspective on the transformation of social care systems and the shift toward community-based services. The analysis is structured around key concepts such as accessibility, participation, autonomy, and social capital, which frame the evolution from a medical to a biopsychosocial model of disability. The paper argues that effective integration requires not only the development of community support networks, but also a change in social attitudes and institutional culture. Emphasis is placed on the role of social policies in promoting human rights, dignity, and active citizenship, as well as on the need for interdisciplinary approaches that connect social work, education, and public health. Through a conceptual synthesis of policy frameworks and contemporary theories of social inclusion, the paper highlights the main challenges and strategic directions for strengthening social cohesion and supporting the independent living of persons with disabilities
References
1. Mansell J., Beadle-Brown J., Deinstitutionalisation and community living: Outcomes and costs. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 2010, 35(2), 81–94.
2. Gerber G.J. et al., Adjustment, integration, and quality of life among forensic patients receiving community outreach services. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2003, 2(2), 129–136.
3. Taylor Salisbury T., Killaspy H., King M., The relationship between deinstitutionalisation and homelessness and imprisonment. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2016, 51(4), 523–534.
4. Shakespeare T., Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. London: Routledge; 2013.
5. World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
6. European Commission. European Disability Strategy 2010–2020. Brussels; 2010.
7. Keesler J.M., From the asylum to the community: Deinstitutionalization and people with intellectual disability. Disabilities, 2022, 2(1), 19.
8. Dijkers M.P., Community integration: conceptual issues and measurement approaches. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1999, 80, 21–30.
9. Prince P.N., Prince C.R., Perceived stigma and community integration. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 2002, 25(4), 323–331.
10. Emerson E., Hatton C., Deinstitutionalisation in the UK. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 1994, 19(3), 219–232.
11. Lamb H.R., Bachrach L.L., Some perspectives on deinstitutionalization. Psychiatric Services, 2001, 52(8), 1039–1045.
12. Killaspy H. et al., Supported accommodation for people with mental health problems. British Journal of Psychiatry, 2016, 209(5), 394–400.
13. Aubry T., Myner J., Community integration and quality of life. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 1996, 19(4), 5–13.
14. Goffman E. Asylums., New York: Anchor Books; 1961.
15. Scull A., Decarceration. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1977.
16. Foucault M., Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books; 1977.
17. Taylor S.J., Bogdan R., Deinstitutionalization and community living. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1982.
18. Bigby C., Fyffe C., Tensions between institutional closure and service reform. Disability & Society, 2006, 21(7), 737–751.
19. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: UN; 2006.
20. Payne M., Modern Social Work Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014.
21. Esping-Andersen G., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.
22. Scull A., Social Order/Mental Disorder. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1989.
23. Wolfensberger W., The Principle of Normalization. Toronto; 1972.
24. Ware N.C., Hopper K., Living with schizophrenia. Social Science & Medicine, 1997, 45(4), 465–477.
25. Link B.G., Phelan J.C., Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 2001, 27, 363–385.
26. OECD. Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. Paris: OECD; 2010.
27. Bigby C., Beadle-Brown J., Improving quality of life in supported accommodation. Journal of
Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2018, 31(2), 223–236.
28. Corrigan P.W., Watson A.C., Understanding the impact of stigma. World Psychiatry, 2002, 1(1),16–20.
29. European Commission. European Framework for Social Services of Excellence. Brussels; 2014.
30. Gooding P., Supported decision-making. Laws, 2013, 2(3), 206–219.
31. World Health Organization. WHO QualityRights Tool Kit. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 PANGEEA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
